Michael Kaethler continues his Pedestrian Experiments series, in which he discovers Buenos Aires on foot using the concept of psychogeography, by walking the entire length of Subte line D.
“We are bored in the city, there is no longer any Temple of the Sun. Between the legs of the women walking by, the dadaists imagined a monkey wrench and the surrealists a crystal cup. That’s lost,” wrote Ivan Chtcheglov, one of the fathers of psychogeography, in his ‘Formulary for a New Urbanism’. He claims that we have lost a sense of imagining the city, no longer does it contain the phantasmagoric.

Congreso de Tucumán on line D (Photo: Diego Herrera)
How would you describe your routine movements in Buenos Aires? Do they fill you with surprise, awe, and inspiration—or quite the opposite?
Street corners, gutters, pavement, bends, movement, art, hidden nooks, and exposed cracks—what do we notice, what catches our eye and captures our interest? Is it true, that amidst so much distraction we have lost our sense of discovery within the city?
A regular part of my urban existence is the subte, I ride it frequently yet often have no idea of the neighbourhoods that I travel under. I feel dislocated when I arrive at my destination. Whole parts of the city remain glaringly blank in my mental map, void of exploration.
With this in mind I set off on a voyage of discovery, to walk the city’s longest metro line, Línea D (the Green line that was, strangely enough, formerly the red line pre-90s). I did this both to discover what sits and fits between and to try my hand at discovering the city anew.
In the heat of the middle of the day, I rode the metro to Congreso de Tucumán subte station from where I began the long walk to Catedral station. Unfortunately I had no suitable walking shoes and my satchel had recently disintegrated, which meant having to walk in my flip-flops and with my girlfriend’s embroidered shoulder-bag (not ideal).

The crowd walks along the subte hallways (photo: Galio)
The metro/subway/subte or however you want to call the underground rapid transit system is an ingenious method of transport. No traffic, simple to navigate, reliable, and in the winter doesn’t require waiting in the cold.
However, these systems severely alter the way in which cities are understood and lived, making it possible to experience certain parts of the city without needing to cogently connect them together, giving the illusion that neighbourhoods float independently from one another. For instance, it’s possible to live in Belgrano and work in Microcentro without having to ever see what lies in between. It’s a way of folding up space; our brains create new maps that match our experience of these two places – separate yet connected.
Buenos Aires’ subte, opened in 1913, was the first in South America or south of the equator, for that matter. It boasts six lines that carry 1.7 million passengers a day, a number that looks staggeringly high but falls behind daily ridership numbers of considerably smaller cities like Prague and Vienna and ranked globally at only 28th.
The 77 subte stations are nothing out of the ordinary. They don’t offer elaborate showcases of Soviet pomp like Moscow’s or modernist masterpieces like Montreal’s. But, there is a certain charm to Buenos Aires’ subte, particularly some of the bizarre tile murals (is that a topless mermaid or a fish with breasts at Angel Gallardo?) and Línea A’s rolling stock classical carriages and the whole system’s Anglo-legacy with the direction that the carriages travel, which follow the British logic of driving on the left hand side.
Similar to air travel, the metro can induce forms of spatial dislocation. As I emerged from Congreso de Tucumán, I found myself gaping at the street names and seeking familiar landmarks to orient myself.

The "murales" on line D (photo: Thomas Hobbs)
The initial walk from Tucumán station was ordinary. Av. Cabildo to Av. Santa Fe was sun-baked, crowded and monotonous. I collected a total of nine flyers, was dripped on twice by an unknown liquid (hopefully water), and had a woman accidently try to hold my hand, mistaking me for her husband. I wasn’t able to reflect on my surroundings or delve into the unnoticed world around me; sidewalk inertia was pushing me forward. I was surprised at how quickly I passed subte station after subte station.
I surveyed the jagged disparate rooflines, they looked like aborted games of Tetris – clumsy blocks thrown together without much logic and left to find their own congruence. Or, like awkward family members posing for a photo.
I passed as travellers entered and exited the stations. Most of those exiting seemed to know where they were going, yet others clearly did not, dawdling on the sidewalk, obstructing passers-by, until they got their bearings.
Crowds increased as I passed the Palermo subte next to the Pacifico train bridge – named after the company that planned, and failed, to build a track from there to Chile. Walking towards Scalabrini Ortiz became tedious, stop-go walking, avoiding crowds, and at several points required perilously walking on the road itself in order to keep a decent pace.
Nonetheless, connecting the subte stations felt rather liberating. The big green signs are like navigational beacons. I was putting together the pieces of an urban puzzle.
It struck me how we live in a giant metropolis heaving with life and yet often fail to appreciate the individuality of its components. Its immensity, throbbing energy and in-built expectations make it onerous to slow down and reflect, to seek out new passages, and re-examine our connection with the city.
After Subte Puerreydón (and yes, it’s ridiculous that there are two stations named this, which sit 1.2km apart) the linear route began to zig-zag towards Facultad de Medicina as I tried to stay as true to the diagonal route of the subte below.
I found my way but I did not find intrigue, just a sense of emptiness. The streets here seemed void of human relations outside of commercial transactions. It was mid-day and brutally hot.

Penultimate station on line D (photo: Kara Brugman)
My interest veered to the sound of birds, I watched as they played on ledges, infinitely more free than the cheerless people with whom I was sharing a sidewalk – sweating in their suits, rushing. I hated the heat, I needed to find a shaded refuge. I finally slumped down against a shaded wall in an unnamed alley, where I waited and watched.
Finally coming across another metro line, Línea C, after the 9 de Julio station was a magnificent moment. I am sure something quite akin to discovering the confluence of the Nile. And shortly after this excitement, my ambulation ended as I made my way down the steps of Catedral station, hot and tired.
While I walked I wondered whether it was to be a fruitless endeavor. I wasn’t convinced that I was gaining a familiarity with Línea D, connecting some of the gaps in my mental map of the city nor discovering parts of the city anew. It was only afterwards, when riding on the subte from Catedral, that I realised this new knowledge invoked a completely different metro ride experience; I felt intimately aware of what was passing above me and how the stations were connected, what lay between, and the feeling derived from walking that space.
Robert Park, an urban sociologist from the late 19th century claimed that the city is built in man’s image – in his desires and wants. The city I witnessed, the city that lies above Línea D struck me as utilitarian; movement from point-of-habitation to point-of-work to point-of-consumption and repeat – a city that’s lost its imagination as observed by Ivan Chtcheglov. In this regard, I would look to Marx and side with the situationists and argue that the city that lies above Linea D is built in the image of the bourgeoisie – their desires and wants.
But did I miss something, is there something more, something playful, dangerous, and exciting at the prospect of the city. Do I have to look deeper, explore more widely or just avoid walking in the mid-day heat?