Tag Archive | "Media"

Venezuela: President Calls for Less Coverage of Country’s Violence


Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has called upon the owners of private media companies Televen and Venevisión, along with other broadcasters, to create a “new television” featuring less coverage of the country’s violence. The initiative was proposed yesterday during a cabinet meeting at the Palacio de Miraflores and is designed to promote a “culture of peace” in Venezuelan media.

Source Wikipedia

President Nicolas Maduro
Source Wikipedia

The invitation for an “alliance for life” by Maduro takes place in the middle of an ongoing government struggle with local media, who officials accuse of scaremongering in order to “sabotage the government”.

Maduro said: “What compels them to promote disloyalty, betrayal, drugs, violence, weapon culture, and revenge? Because it is what sells the most.” He added that: “The issue of criminality is the main problem of the human character of the country.”

Maduro spoke of the proposed change in media coverage as part of his wider anti-violence campaign ‘Plan Patria Segura’, or Homeland Security Plan. The plan saw 3,000 soldiers from the National Bolivarian Armed Forces (FANB) deployed in the capital of Caracas on Monday in order to control the city’s current high crime and homicide rate.

The invitation by Maduro comes as the recently sold government opposition network Globovisión have assured that they will not change their political stance or editorial line, contrary to reports that surfaced on Tuesday. After the sale of the network, a statement was published on their website announcing that they would be changing their editorial line “toward the centre”. However, in a meeting with employees, owners Juan Domingo Cordero and Raúl Gorrín assured that their political ideologies would remain and all current employees would keep their jobs.

Posted in News From Latin America, Round Ups Latin AmericaComments (0)

Retweet Culture


Twitter logo map (photo by The Next Web)

Those who, like me, spent their teenage years in the late 90s, may remember sitting in front of the TV to watch The X-Files and witness the many misadventures of FBI agent Fox Mulder, a paranoid sociopath whose obsession with conspiracy theories became an iconic trademark of the Clintonian era.

In his crusade to defeat a global conspiracy, Mulder’s ethos was strongly based on his personal motto, “trust no one”. However, whenever one of his allies showed up with some outlandish paranormal claim, he would turn into a gullible wide-eyed boy ready to believe anything as long as it was compatible with his own convictions.

Fast forward to the present (and real life), where a disgraceful media battle is holding consumers of information captive to its whims to interpret and relativise facts as it wishes while an army of social media decipherers, in a quasi-automaton state, forwards and re-tweets any ruinous headline that may help push their preconceived beliefs -no matter what the source.

As we actively participate in this over-sharing process, we distrust whoever is ideologically opposed to us, while blindly follow those on our side heralding the apocalypse and more unless we react. Face it: we’ve been totally Mulderised.

A case in point is when anti-K journalist Jorge Lanata and his video crew were momentarily detained, frisked, and stripped of their footage in Caracas in October, and the immediate reaction from the ultra-Ks was to call the whole move a conspiracy to make the Chávez government look bad, because how dare they accuse a government of doing intelligence work, no matter what the evidence.

A few weeks later, after Harvard student Juan Ignacio Maquieyra was hoisted as a national hero by the anti-Ks and a traitor by the ultra-Ks for his unwavering grit when questioning Cristina about her re-reelection plans, many were horrified to find out that the AFIP tax agency was harassing and investigating his family, clearly as a result of his inconvenient interrogation. Appalling, right? Only it never happened.

Weaponised (i.e. intended to damage) posts become viral very fast despite their dark origins and questionable veracity of the source. And when a story such as the AFIP raid spreads, it doesn’t matter that the alleged victim denies it ever took place. The damage is already done, and the “Did you hear?” factor has already talked you into thinking we’re living in North Korea.

In this retweet culture we’re living, it is easier to forward an email and pat yourself in the back for contributing to the enlightenment of the masses than to embark in a boring quest for facts. So we take part in that parade of canards by sharing many of those unsubstantiated (and often insane) claims online because, let’s face it, they help us prove our point.

No one is innocent in this game of dirty politics, but that doesn’t mean you have to play it too. Scientists try to find the truth by seeking evidence to the contrary, so next time you post a photo of your Sunday morning brunch on Instagram and then feel the urge to make a savvy political statement to prove to yourself that you’re not apathetic, remember to scrutinise the facts before accusing Cristina of eating babies for breakfast.

George Carlin used to say: “Don’t just teach your children to read… Teach them to question what they read.” Looks like our parents didn’t listen.

Posted in OpinionComments (0)

Weekly News Roundup, Special 7D Edition


It’s Friday again!

And if you’re reading this it’s because you survived December 6th, a day that will be remembered as one of the most eventful days in recent history.

Today was expected to be a day to remember, as the much-dreaded December 7th (also referred to as “7D”) was supposed to arrive.

Remember? 7D! The day that the National Government had been advertising for months as the day in which Grupo Clarín‘s hegemonic dominance of terror was going to come to an end, prompting humanity to leave its current state of slumber and transition to a higher plane of consciousness that brings forth a new age of global understanding.

And yet, today feels totally anticlimactic. Because it was yesterday that the unexpected (and probably jealous) “6D” ended up stealing all the attention.

It’s hard to sum up in a few words the humongous amount of shit that happened yesterday. The feeling of anxiety, the uncertainty, the despair and the hilarious Twitter jokes that helped us engage in collective catharsis.

Last night, hundreds of newspaper editors around the country were scratching their heads thinking of a single headline that could easily convey the wave of catastrophes that befell upon us without splashing the front cover with the word CHAOS.

Let’s just say that if yesterday had been a TV show, it would have been 24. And I’m not sure even Jack Bauer could have handled the pressure.

Suggested soundtrack for the following read: this. And don’t forget to like the Weekly News Roundup on Facebook so you can keep up with future updates.

The following takes place between 8 AM and midnight, on December 6th 2012:

  • President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner holding a copy of Clarín. And she's holding it weird. What's up with her left arm? It looks like one of those action figure arms that bend in a weird way. You know which ones I mean? It's like they try really hard to make them look human but dude, no. (Photo/Wikipedia)

    [8:00 AM] It’s raining in Buenos Aires and yet the heat is suffocating. The humidity is through the roof and millions of women complain about having a bad hair day. I know this seems like the end of the world but trust me, it gets worse. A lot worse.

  • [9:11 AM] I should have suspected it was going to be a horrible day when on my way to a meeting I stepped on a banana peel and crash landed on the sidewalk like some loser. Yes, bad shit happens to me too but at least I exorcise my demons via Twitter. I know this is personal and unrelated but sorry, I just had to talk about it. And to whoever left that banana peel there on purpose: fuck you.
  • [09:45 AM] The action begins. A container in Puerto Madero filled with drums of mercury catches fire. Local networks announce we’re all going to die very quickly.
  • [10:53 AM] As hundreds of terrified parents double park their cars in front of their children’s schools in the downtown area causing traffic chaos and people run for their lives under the rain to escape the stench, former Deputy Mayor of Buenos Aires and current national lawmaker Gabriela Michetti casually tweets that she’s “enjoying the wonderful smell of the jasmines sitting atop her desk”. She becomes the most hated person on Twitter.
  • [11:15 AM] The local authorities recommend the population to stay home, close doors and windows and  turn the AC off. Thousands begin to contemplate suicide. Not because of the poisonous cloud, but because of the suffocating heat inside their homes. All windows locked and the AC off? In this humidity?! Goodbye, cruel world.
  • [11:20 AM] It is still raining. All Subte stations in the area close and the service is interrupted. The Retiro station is shut down before the last train arrives to the platform. Passengers get off the train and realize they are trapped inside, breathing the contaminated air. Oops!
  • [11:25 AM] All trains in the Mitre line suspend their services to Retiro. People trying to escape the area are royally fucked.
  • [11:27 AM] You know how you keep talking about taking a cruise someday and enjoying a non-eventful holiday? Well if you ever do, make sure your cruise has not been docked next to a fucking toxic cloud. It was like “Speed 2“, only less exciting and with better acting. It’s OK though, they sent the cruise to high seas for precaution and the only downside was that the tourists could not visit Palermo Soho and buy overpriced crap they would have never used anyway.
  • [11:34 AM] Several people begin to report dizziness, and a burning sensation in throat and lungs. If they end up turning into zombies I’m gonna be sooooo pissed.
  • [12:00 PM] Thousands of evacuees are disappointed after learning that the deadly cloud is actually not deadly and they have to return to work.
  • [12:32 PM] The rain stops.
  • [1:00 PM] Nothing happens, which is kinda of a bad omen.
  • [2:00 PM] Sky turns black. It starts raining again, but this time it’s a torrential rain. People look outside their windows and find out they are unable to see the other side of the street.
  • [3:00 PM] It is still raining like crazy. People begin to exchange gazes of confusion and legitimate concern. This rain is not normal. “Maybe it’s some kind of toxic rain, a result of the toxic cloud,” says a Twitter user clearly well versed in meteorology and with a degree from the University of Just Pulled That Out of my Ass.
  • [4:15 PM] Cronica decides to go with another groundbreaking headline: “From Chernobyl to Venice“. Twitter explodes again.
  • [4:30 PM] Because things are apparently kinda dull today, coach drivers decide to go on strike and block the exit of the Retiro bus station, trapping inside the facilities all passengers who were planning on going away for the weekend.
  • [5:00 PM] As the heavy storm continues to flood the city, news break of a shootout at the DOT shopping mall. Initial reports suggest a group of 50 savages have entered the mall and begun ransacking stores and cannibalizing people or something. Seems legit.
  • [5:10 PM] All subway lines interrupted due to severe flooding. Severe as in “completely under water”. More traffic chaos ensues.
  • [5:15 PM] Blackouts are registered throughout the City as a result of the intense storm. Thousands complain about not being able to check their Twitter feed for snark.
  • [5:23 PM] Buenos Aires finally collapses. The Arroyo Vega overflows and the busy commercial corner of Blanco Encalada and Cabildo Av. now looks like a disaster scene from The Bible, with hundreds of people trapped in over a meter of water. God help us all.
  • [6:10 PM] A tornado?!  Are you fucking kidding me?! What’s next, Godzilla?!
  • [6:37 PM] Turns out the angry mob at the DOT was just protesting that due to the building’s poorly designed drain system, their settlement (Villa Mitre) was flooded, so they decided to take it out with the stores. There were no shots fired, no people eaten. Happy ending, kind of.
  •  [6:41 PM] Rumors begin to surface suggesting that a federal court has decided to extend the injunction on the Media Law requested by Clarín, a move that would effectively ruin the National Government’s celebrations prepared for December 7th (when the injunction was set to expire). In the newsroom where I work, I begin banging my head incessantly on my keyboard. This is the longest day of my (journalistic) life.
  • [6:49 PM] Worst fears confirmed: the injunction has been extended. Millions of anti-Kirchnerites celebrate throughout the country while the Government just stands there, jaw-dropped in disbelief. The 7D mythology has been exterminated only a few hours before the celebrations began. In the newsroom, I try to cut my veins with one of those plastic spoons but my colleagues restrain me and talk me out of it by bringing Jesus into the conversation.
  • [7:30 PM] Godzilla finally shows up.
  • [7:57 PM] People begin to freak out again as the Buenos Aires sky

    I have a feeling that if Jack Bauer lived in Buenos Aires he would have perished by around noon. (Photo/Wikipedia)

    acquires this sort of reddish hue that either heralds the end of times or means that a nuclear bomb just went off. Whatever the case may be, I’m ready. Bring it.

  • [8:24 PM] In social networks, the expression “6D” starts to become “a thing”. I hate humanity.
  • [9:30 PM] Tony Bennet is singing at the Gran Rex and I’m missing it because I have tons of work to do thanks to this interminable day.
  •  [11:59 PM] The coach drivers’ strike ends one minute before midnight, all passengers are freed. At the same time, the storm recedes, the water levels decrease, the cleaning staff at the DOT mall mumbles in discontent, Cristina is flying to Brazil with her blood pressure probably through the roof and the chairmen of the Grupo Clarín sacrifice a few babies to thank Baphomet for the blessings received. All in all a  pretty productive day.

OK, that was yesterday. Exciting, wasn’t it? Now here comes the second part!

(Yes, I still need to tell you about what happened during the rest of the week, FML).

So… this is what you need to know:

  • Look on the bright side. At least it rained so much in this past week that I’m sure that for the next few months there’s nothing but beach and sunshine ahead of us.
  • Argentina is tired -TIRED!- of supplicating the US to buy its lemons and beef. But the US will not have any of that nonsense because lemons are ugly. Have you ever eaten a lemon? There you go. See? I wouldn’t buy them either. But the Government, who seems to despise the inconveniences of the domestic judicial system but loves taking bilateral disputes to whatever available international court it can find, decided that it was time to pull out the big guns and filed a complaint against the US (and the EU) before the World Trade Organization.
  • The US and the EU, flabbergasted over such blatant display of disrespect for the elderly, decided to fight back,  denouncing Argentina for its “protectionist practices”. Japan and Mexico were hanging around and since our relationship with them has also been less than perfect, they jumped on board with the complaint. I mean, why not?
  • You know how some people like to use the term “post-racial America” just because the US elected a black president? As if electing a black president made racism magically evaporate from the land? Well the same thing can be said about Argentina and gay marriage. It was legalized here in 2010, but you can’t talk of a “post-homophobia Argentina”, because the crazies abound in this country, and are still drinking from the chalice of bigotry and ignorance. As if the controversial school play video that surfaced two weeks ago was not enough to make you lose all hope in humanity, here’s another video of a teacher in a Tucumán religious school telling her students how discriminating against gays and lesbians is not that bad. No, no, it’s OK! She also says that when “normal” parents get separated, that’s also frowned upon. So chances are she just needs to get laid. Any volunteers? Anyone? No? OK.
  • Get ready to roll your eyes. It happens every time a new global  pop culture phenomenon appears: Argentina claims authorship, saying they made it here first. The latest victim? Psy’s “Gangnam Style“. That’s right, the moves from that hypnotic and incomprehensible South Korean music video that has us all dancing like idiots have allegedly been “inspired” by “Claudio y la Banda Brillante” (?). Or so the local media says, since the moves are “suspiciously similar”. Here, you be the judge.
  • Wanna hear something depressing? If you were hoping for the iPhone 5 to reach Argentina anytime soon, I’ve got some bad news. Because Apple just released the list of nations that will be carrying the sleek new device and the land of tango is nowhere to be found. Even Grenada, a country that until now you thought was a city in Spain, is getting the iPhone 5 before Argentina. The freaking Ivory Coast is getting it before us. And those guys are probably dealing with a civil war or something! If for some reason you feel like ruining your day, here is a full list of the countries that will be getting the iPhone 5 while we’re stuck with the previous version which is sooooooooo 2011 (therefore obsolete).
  • The media, always ready to dose us with a thick balm of dramaqueenism, made all possible efforts to turn every football fan in the world into a tantrum-prone, frenetic 5-year-old girl after demi-god and superstar Lionel Messi was injured this week in a match against a club apparently called the “Betis.” Messi, as it is customary, was on a roll that evening and was looking to break a new record of most goals scored in a year, a title that is currently held by some German guy named Müller (85). The press, already speaking of a “curse” (because, as we all know, Messi’s life is notable for its interminable strain of horrific afflictions), described the injury process with impressive detail: “Lío (they call him “Lío” because that way sports journalists and readers can feel like they are establishing a personal relationship with him, like when celebrities refer to other celebrities on a first name basis even though they never met each other) tried to avoid Benfica goalkeeper Artur Moraes, but Moraes tried to block him and hit his knee at the exact moment in which Messi was pivoting and throwing all his weight on his left knee (fascinating, isn’t it?). The”flea” (barf) kicked the ball and then collapsed to the floor in pain.” A press release issued by the Barcelona team assured that Messi only had a “bruised left knee,” which is something we’ve all had (and worse), so I don’t know what the big deal is. Then again, not all of us are insured for like 40 trillion euros.

Have a great weekend, everyone!

Send Adrian your comments, thoughts or tips at adrbono@gmail.com or follow him on Twitter at @AdrianBono

And don’t forget to like the Weekly News Roundup on Facebook, so we don’t have to keep reminding you about this every Friday.

Posted in Thoughts of a ForeignerComments (8)

Uruguay: President Mujica to Review Media Decree


Uruguayan President José Mujica has announced that he will review a decree that would regulate the allocation of government advertising, which is produced by private media companies based largely in the capital, Montevideo.

The initiative has met with the support of the Press Organisation of the Interior (OPI), the Interior Association of Radios, and Red Oro, a network of 54 media affiliates.

According to a report released by the Media and Society Group, the text of the decree complies with international standards of freedom of expression and plurality. Its approval would make Uruguay the first country in the region to adopt a national norm that requires fairness and objectivity in the distribution of state broadcasting.

Currently, 95% of government advertising is produced by companies based in Montevideo, with only 3% produced in the interior of the country.

The OPI said in a statement of support that “to concentrate government advertising in businesses based in Montevideo is unjust and inefficient.”

Red Oro echoed these sentiments, affirming that the equitable allocation of state broadcasting production would generate important sources of labour throughout the country. They also expressed their desire for the creation of a fund for the realisation of audience and media circulation surveying.

The Interior Association of Radios noted that the decree would set aside at least 30% of all state advertising production for media companies and organisations outside of the capital.

Story courtesy of Agencia Púlsar, an AMARC-ALC news agency.

Posted in News From Latin America, Round Ups Latin AmericaComments (0)

Clarín Accused of Suing Journalists, Attacking Freedom of Expression


A new judicial controversy surrounding Grupo Clarín emerged this week as the media giant was accused of legally denouncing journalists of public TV channels for “inciting violence”.

Early this week several sources claimed that lawyers for Grupo Clarín had deposed a legal procedure against several public media journalists and government workers.

The Argentine National Justice Palace (Roblespepe, Wikimedia)

Clarín allegedly accused these of “inciting violence” after they called to “fight against Grupo Clarín by all necessary means”.

The reactions to the news were instantaneous. Agustín Rossi, deputy for the Frente Para la Victoria (FPV) ruling party, said:

“This confirms what we have been saying for ages: Grupo Clarín is absolutely not interested in a free press and freedom of expression, they are only interested in maintaining the hegemonic situation they hold on the current media scene.”

Clarín has since then retracted, with the editor of the newspaper, Ricardo Kirschbaum, stating that they “should have never included the name of journalists in a legal complaint”. However Clarín has also stated that the journalists involved in the legal procedure were only named as potential witnesses rather than suspects.

In a statement released by the lawyers behind the complaint, José María Sáenz Valiente, Hugo Wortman Jofré, and Alejandro Pérez Chada said:

“In the complaint we asked that an investigation be opened that would determine if a series of public actions and statements from government workers that called to fight media of the group, its journalists and directors, accusing them of undermining democracy and even to be responsible for kidnappings and of provoking security forces uprisings, were designed to provoke action that could constitute the crime of ‘inciting collective violence’ (art. 212 of the penal code).”

In response Horacio Verbitsky, president of the Centre of Legal and Social Studies (CELS), in charge of the defence of the journalists, said that Clarín “could not even defend on Monday what they signed on the previous Thursday,” claiming that the journalists “had been accused and equated to government workers”.

Earlier this week the Supreme Court rejected Clarín’s demand to extend an injuction in the court case opposing it to the government over the new media law.

Posted in News From Argentina, Round Ups ArgentinaComments (1)

Argentine Journalist Accuses Venezuelan Authorities of Censorship


Argentine journalist Jorge Lanata claims that police held him and a group of journalists for over two hours at Simón Bólivar Airport in Caracas on Monday.

Lanata said that during this time the police erased the material he had recorded while covering the presidential elections in Venezuela.

Lanata, from Canal 13, is one of the most well-known figures of Argentine journalism and is an outspoken critic of Argentine president, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, a close ally of Hugo Chávez, Venezuela’s recently re-elected president.

The Argentine ambassador to Venezuela, Carlos Cheppi, said that he had been in touch with the Venezuelan Interior Minister after he heard Lanata was being held up at the airport and that he had assured him “no material was extracted or erased”.

“They told me that there was some form of provocation from Lanata, with him very visibly showing a dossier  from Intelligence Services which is why they stopped him in the first place,” said Cheppi.

Lanata told TV channel TN that SEBIN (the Venezuelan intelligence services) wanted to interrogate him on suspicion of spying after he had revealed secret information. According to Lanata he had made public the fact that SEBIN had been ordered to monitor his team while in the country and asked whether this decision had been taken through pressure from the Argentine government.

“What they did was erase all our computers, all our telephones, which meant that we couldn’t communicate with anyone. I wanted to contact the Argentine Embassy and I couldn’t,” said Lanata.

“We felt very alone in those dark rooms of the SEBIN where we were threatened and robbed by policemen,” describes Nicolás Wiñazki, one of the journalists of Lanata’s group, in his column in Clarín.

The Argentine government, through Gustavo López of the President’s Office, has raised suspicions about Lanata’s description of events.

“It seems strange that with thousands of journalists, thousands of media companies, absolutely against Hugo Chávez’ government, with very strong interests, as are some of the North American media, the only one who had a problem is him,” López told news agency DyN.

López then called for “a bit more clarity” as to what happened and said that if freedom of speech had been impeded they would support Lanata as this “fundamental right should not be tainted by political interests”.

Posted in News From Argentina, Round Ups ArgentinaComments (0)

Chile: Government Stockholders Vote to Close La Nación


Government stockholders voted to close the publication La Nación permanently at a board meeting this morning. Assets will be liquidated and 117 workers will be left unemployed.

The Chilean government holds 70% of the company’s stock and therefore a decisive role in the publication’s future. According to a TeleSUR correspondent, government representatives were the only members who voted in favour of the closure. President Sebastián Piñera has advocated the liquidation since before assuming the presidency in 2010.

The decision is strongly opposed by private stockholders, journalist unions, social organisations, and several parliamentarians. Union representative Víctor Pérez told Radio Tierra, “The arrogance and tyranny of this government prevailed.” Representatives for La Nación employees slated for unemployment filed a case in the Appeals Court of Santiago to dispute the closure.

National Secretary General Andrés Chadwick defended the decision in front of the stockholders’ board, saying, “For 20 years we have seen a newspaper, La Nación, that has always had the tendency to be utilized under the government in power, and we believe that this is not convenient.”

Parliamentarian Hugo Gutiérrez has called upon the government to explain the decision in front of a special session of the Chamber of Deputies. “The citizenry wants to know what the motivation, the reason, is, and I believe that Chadwick must explain it.”

The publication stopped printing last December after a decrease in income, subsisting solely online since then. Nevertheless, according to Pérez, the company earned more than 2bn Chilean pesos last year, the equivalent of US$4mn.

La Nación has published continuously for 95 years.

Posted in News From Latin America, Round Ups Latin AmericaComments (0)

Opposition and Media in Argentina


President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (courtesy of Wikipedia)

When Cristina Fernández de Kirchner won last year’s presidential election with a landslide 54% of the votes, it was not only the amount of support but how far she was ahead of her competitors that made the victory so impressive.

The 46% of the votes she did not win were split between six opposition parties, with second-placed Frente Amplio Progresista (FAP) obtaining a meagre 17%. It was a pretty good reflection of the situation of government and opposition at the time.

After the government lost its parliamentary majority due to a disastrous result in the 2009 election, the opposition did not manage to live up to the expectations placed upon it. Renamed “Group A”, the illusion of a strong, coordinated opposition capable of snatching the political initiative from a weak government quickly faded away. It soon became evident that, unable to set a common agenda, the only thing holding “Group A” together was its animosity towards the government. To paraphrase Borges, they were not united by love, but by horror.

The lack of initiative and fragmentation of the opposition were apparent in the poor performance of an almost paralysed Congress throughout 2010 and 2011, when only 70 and 65 bills were passed respectively, well below the ten-year average of 116.

And so we arrived at October 2011. In the two years since the fateful 2009 election, the government managed to regain control of the agenda, aided by its own initiative, the shock caused by the death of former president Néstor Kirchner, and the lack of a serious and organised political opposition.

It only takes a quick look around, however, to realise that there is an important, and very vocal, sector of society that does not feel represented by the government. As opposition is an integral part of democracy, the question of who represents those people is one that must be asked.

It has become quite evident for many in the past few years, specifically since the campo crisis of 2008, that the weakness of opposition parties has resulted in certain economic groups affected by governmental policies taking political matters into their own hands. At the forefront of this new opposition are those with the most influence on public opinion: the media corporations.

The 'cacerolazos' in Plaza de Mayo (Photo: Luciano Signorelli)

In Argentina, politics has become to a large extent a war between pro and anti-government media groups unabashedly campaigning for their own interests, without much regard for the traditional laws of journalistic ethics.

An interesting debate about the role of the media has since ensued, not only in Argentina, but also in Latin America and other parts of the world. The sanctity of journalism and its classic role as the “fourth estate” have been brought into question as big media groups are, analytically speaking, stripped bare and shown for what they mostly are: businesses. Powerful businesses, with political interests and a massive influence over public opinion and politicians alike.

There is a positive side to this situation, as nothing in a democracy should be immune to analysis, discussion, and criticism. Media groups have always had political and economic interests, and it is a positive thing that people have become more aware of this and can see through their supposed neutrality.

The obvious negative side is that businesses are not elected and are not accountable to society as politicians, government officials, union delegates, and other political institutions are. This is not exclusive to media businesses, as it is becoming clear all over the world that uncontrolled corporations are openly displacing elected politicians from their decision-making roles.

In Argentina, this situation has evolved from a more-or-less open support of certain media groups to specific political parties and candidates, to the current situation where they seem to have mostly given up on politicians altogether. Nowadays, it is journalists like Jorge Lanata with his Sunday TV show that seem to set the opposition’s agenda for the rest of the week.

The debilitating effect of such political weakness was demonstrated by the recent cacerolazos in Buenos Aires. They were small, unorganised gatherings of individuals without any clear direction or common ideas, other than a visceral rejection of the government. It is worrying that for many, being unorganised was seen as a virtue rather than a weakness.

A political movement without solid ideas and organisation is doomed to fail. And politics, like nature in Aristotelian physics, abhors a vacuum. If the vacuum left by a weak opposition is not filled by legitimate and solid political institutions, it is going to be filled by whoever has the power to impose their point of view.

Posted in Analysis, TOP STORYComments (2)

Impeachment or Coup? Deciphering the Voices in the Paraguayan Media


Close up of the Presidential Palace, now Federico Franco's home (Photo: Allendria Brunjes)

On 21st June, the Paraguayan House of Deputies voted 73-1 to hold a hearing that would decide whether Fernando Lugo should be impeached from his position as president.  One day later, on 22nd June, the Senate voted and Lugo lost his job to his vice-president, current president Federico Franco.

Congress called it democratic impeachment. Lugo called it an “express coup d’état.”

Foreign media jumped on the words “coup d’état” and ran images of the protest in Asunción on Friday evening. Many countries took drastic diplomatic action, with Argentina’s President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner going as far as to pull its Paraguayan ambassador.

Local media reports, on the other hand, have varied. Along with cries of censorship regarding the country’s public television station, there have been reports of deep corruption in some of the nation’s newspapers.

The only time “Paraguay” has been googled more than now has been during major sports events, and the country’s internet presence is growing.

In this war of words, every newspaper line, television image, radio clip, tweet or blog post sharing a slogan or point of view can move the public and change the narrative.

And with so many voices crying to hijack the discourse in Paraguay, the truth of the situation is hard to discern.

Protests and Local Reports

The night of the impeachment, thousands gathered in Plaza Independencia, in downtown Asunción, to protest Congress’ decision. In images circulated around the world, riot police and water cannons pushed people from the government offices after the decision.

By the 23rd June, there were just a handful of protestors left in the plaza. Packing up their blankets and bags, the half-dozen youths occasionally shouted chants, calling for democracy in Paraguay.

Celso Velázquez and Concepción Oviedo were two of those protestors. Both are members of the student movement CREAR. Oviedo said although the movement started with students’ interests in mind, they found the situation too important not to protest.

“The parliamentarians – the senators and deputies – in one day decided the future of the country, and put in place a person who was not elected [as president] by the citizens in 2008,” she said. “And so, they cut the democratic process that started in 2008.”

Asunción's Plaza Independencia stands empty the day after the protests. (Photo: Allendria Brunjes)

Velázquez said he started protesting 21stJune. He noted that although he does not support Lugo, he supports democracy and believes the process to remove him was undemocratic. “Now, Paraguay is under a dictator,” he said. “It was the opinion of Parliament, not the fruit of popular vote. The international community is not recognising this government, and there could be an economic decline and blockades against Paraguay.”

By 23rd June, most protestors in favour of Lugo’s return to the Presidential Palace were in front of TV Pública, Paraguay’s public television station. There, hundreds of people took their turn in front of the camera during the station’s “Open Microphone” – a program which usually lasts two hours, that ran straight for a couple of days.

Rodrigo Tellez runs the new-media company SEO Paraguay. Soon after the Senate’s decision, he started the website Noticias Desde Paraguay to crowdsource information from various social media. From the site, he broadcast TV Pública’s continuous coverage of the protest.

“When it started, there was a little bit of repression of information,” he says. “[Citizens] were speaking what they were thinking, how they feel about the recent situation, and you couldn’t see that on TV or on any station. [Government] even tried to pull the plug on their energy – they sent the energy company to cut them out. But after a time – thanks to social media – everybody could see what was really happening in the country, and it forced the politicians to put that on air.”

José María Costa is a professor of journalism, information law, new technologies and cultural industries at the National University of Asunción. Now a columnist, Costa has decades of experience in the field as a journalist for the Paraguayan daily Última Hora and a voice on radio. Having reported in Paraguay during Alfredo Stroessner’s 35-year dictatorship, he says he thinks the media today is quite free to report what they want. He says the freedom of media to criticise Congress and the sequence of events is the “most palpable and most conclusive evidence that there is.”

“In the period of transition from 1989 to today, Paraguayan society has recuperated many freedoms,” he says. “One of the freedoms, obviously, is freedom of speech and freedom of the press.”

He says he believes TV Pública was practically in Lugo’s party’s hands, and did not permit opinions and visions contrary to his political thinking. “[It was] the state’s own television station, none other than its own voice criticising the [new] government,” he says. “I would find it difficult to find another situation like it in Latin America. The public television station of Argentina doing this – Cristina Kirchner allowing this at this time, or TeleSUR in Venezuela doing the same – it wouldn’t happen.”

As far as traditional forms of media are concerned, in Paraguay as around the world, the almighty dollar is a driving force in what makes it to the evening news.  “What is emerging now is journalistic media that exploits sensationalism, as a mechanism to increase ratings,” Costa says. “They create journalism and communicate with a feeling that is much more sensational.”

The Growth of New Media

Paraguay is one of the continent’s least connected nations. When Lugo became president in 2008 Paraguay had 530,300 internet users – 7.8% of the population – according to the United Nations’ specialised agency for information and communication technologies. Costa says that in just four years, that number has risen to about 20% or 30% of the population.

“It’s a real growth,” he says. “I believe that accompanying this real growth of internet penetration, there was growth in the use of internet for freedom of speech and the expression of ideas, debates, criticisms – expressions in respect to issues of public interest.”

One Laptop Per Child program is now in schools in Paraguay helping connect children to the internet and more information. (Photo: Christoph Derndorfer)

Tellez says there are both negative and positive aspects to more people using social networks for news. As one positive, he says the diversity of viewpoints increased as Paraguay increased its internet usage.

“Everyone was watching TV, and you can’t really watch what’s happening,” he says. “The owner of one channel wanted you to get his point of view, and the owner of the other channel – I say channel, but it’s networks. The same owner is the owner of one channel, one newspaper and many magazines, and they use it in the same way.”

Tellez – who had to study his trade in Buenos Aires due to the lack of available training in Paraguay – also says the internet helped people around the country understand what was going on despite not being in the capital. “They were watching TV and it was Popeye or some canned film, instead of what was going on,” he says.

Argentina’s Coverage

While representatives from many Latin American countries have been reacting to the impeachment, Argentines have been especially vocal.

Argentine political theorist and professor Atilio Boron said in a recent article that the president’s dismissal was “one of the most blatant acts of fraud in the political history of Latin America,” noting the power of agribusiness, its power in Paraguay and the role it played in Lugo’s impeachment.

He also talks about deep corruption in the newspaper industry, arguing that the nation’s biggest newspaper, ABC Color, among other things “launched an intense campaign prior to the coup d’etat, preparing a political climate that permitted Lugo’s express political hanging.”

Martín Gomez Bustillo, Interim Representative of Argentina to the OAS at a special meeting of the OAS in Washington DC on June 26, 2012. (Photo: Maria Patricia Leiva/OAS)

“The US embassy, together with the agro-industrial transnationals and the oligarchy, made up the gang that dominated Congress,” he said in the article, published with the Latin American television station TeleSUR. “Lugo realised too late what little democracy there is in the institutions of the capitalist state, which removed him in a tragicomic political show trial, violating with impunity all standards of due process.”

The Argentine daily newspaper La Nación also wrote an editorial about the impeachment/coup on Tuesday, noting that the critical countries are also ones with their own issues regarding democracy. “There is thus an asymmetry between the way the almost unanimous decision of the Paraguayan Congress to displace Lugo was attacked, and the indifference with which the continuing constitutional violations of governments with legitimacy of origin are taken,” the article said.

Costa says he believes the transition from Lugo’s government to Franco’s was through “a democratic process,” and that members of Congress “were elected in the same election as Lugo, and with the same quantity of votes.”

Tellez says he believes international governments also have their own interests in mind when it comes to their coverage of the situation. He noted that Latin American countries with “left-leaning” governments would have a special interest in Lugo’s downfall as his party tends toward what is considered the “left” side of the political spectrum.

“Other countries are a bit worried, because they are run by social parties,” he says, bringing up Argentina as an example. “Now, with this happening here, Cristina Kirchner is afraid it could happen to her in her country. She has a lot of stuff that her politicians could say about her to get an impeachment – easy, easy, easy.”

As different forms of social media take hold in Paraguay, the country will be able to represent itself better in the future. Costa says while there is not yet the depth or power seen in Egypt or Tunisia, Paraguay is on its way.

“Obviously, it’s a process that is going to create force,” he says. “But yes, [the crisis] demonstrates that the seed is there, and the feeling is there, too.”

Posted in Analysis, Current Affairs, News From Latin America, TOP STORYComments (1)

Do you think freedom of the press is under threat in Latin America?


World Press Freedom Day took place on 3rd May this year, celebrated in cities around the world. Sponsored by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Science, and Cultural Organisation), the event’s purpose is to examine the promise and challenges facing media of various forms, as well as inform citizens on violations of press freedom that continue to this day.

In Latin American countries, the press has made many important strides, often through some of the most difficult present day conflicts. In cases such as Mexico and Honduras, however, reporters are frequently intimidated and targeted for violence by members of organised crime.  In other countries, such as Venezuela and, to a debatable extent, Ecuador, hostile relationships between the government and certain parts of the press have produced censorship.

In order to find out what residents of Buenos Aires think about the current state of press freedom in Argentina and throughout Latin America, we took to the streets and asked for some opinions.

Photos by Kamilo Hernández

Jorge Alberto Vajanella, 62, Caballito, Public Accountant

Here in Argentina, freedom in the press is very broad. No matter who or where you are, you can say what you want. In the newspaper, on television, on the radio, on the streets, wherever. In Mexico, of course, there is a profoundly serious problem, and in Venezuela the government has considerable control over media and communications. I think the press faces repression in Chile as well, partly because of the right-leaning government. In general, I think the press in Latin America is becoming freer every day, and young people have the resources to continue this trend in the future.

Christian Savloff, 25, Caballito, Works in Film Post-production

I think it’s important to highlight that the press has commercial interests beyond informing us, like Clarín’s role here in Argentina, as well as La Nación. While the point is to truly inform us, in many cases there is a lot of subjectivity, so the reporting is not objective. In places like Venezuela, the government can be very fanatical and tilt the press in favour of Hugo Chávez. To me, respect for the media is very important. I think that if you educate people with various points of view, they will listen and decide.

 
Sara Martínez, 25, Palermo, Works in Fashion/Design

For me, I don’t read the newspapers here as much as I see the news on television or listen to it on the radio. There are plenty of channels, with many different programs, and people can choose from a variety of perspectives to interpret what is going on. I think the trend in Venezuela, with radio stations and newspapers censored by the government, doesn’t seem very good to me because it is cutting away freedom in the press.

 
Angel Benitez, Caballito, 36, Hotels and Tourism

Throughout Latin America, each country’s situation is very different, and the image of the real community we have here gets complicated by propaganda. In Argentina, liberty in the press is very divided. Some think the press is very free, some don’t, and there are also particular situations when it is and it isn’t. Ideologies among citizens and certain outlets will influence how one sees things. I think the background problem uniting all Latin American countries has to do with education. The formation of values, the small details. Partly as a result of fear, partly because of insecurity, the values that truly unite Latin Americans have gotten lost. People are on guard. To me, the fundamental problem is educational, and it’s something that has to change not just in schools, but especially in the family.

Laura Fraguas, 23, Belgrano, Medical Student

I think there is freedom of press in Argentina. I don’t really know the full context of other examples in Latin America, but I think that here, it is free. There exist programs like that of [Jorge] Lanata, or 6-7-8, as well as many that give a full spectrum of political views and information in Argentina. Freedom in the press exists here.

Posted in OpinionComments (0)

Follow us on Twitter
Visit us on Facebook
View us on YouTube

As we continue our focus on art and design, we revisit Kate Stanworth's 2007 interview with Lucio Boschi about his black and white photographs of lesser-known cultures in Argentina.

    Directory Pick of the Week

Magdalena's Party in Palermo

Magdalena’s Party has daily 2 x 1 Happy Hour specials til midnight, and the "best onda".
Sign up to The Indy newsletter