
Mauricio Macri (Photo courtesy of Mauricio Macri)
Mayor Mauricio Macri’s decree in defence of the freedom of the press and freedom of expression is being debated today in the city legislature.
Helio Rebot will chair the Commission for Constitutional Affairs meeting during which Macri’s decree will come under scrutiny.
Although the decree has already been published, the commission will establish whether or not it should in fact be in force, or whether it should be rejected by the legislature in the coming month.
The emergency decree, signed on 14th May, aims to “guarantee the protection of journalists and the media throughout all of Buenos Aires.”
It also puts forward the idea that Argentina’s capital ought to operate within a specially created legal jurisdiction, allowing it to intervene in affairs which endanger freedom of expression.
Rebot opened the meeting with the following: “If it is ratified, this decree will be about more than Macri, it will protect future journalists, whatever their opinion.”
The emergency decree has also attracted strong opposition. Their arguments range from suggestions that the decree is unconstitutional and lacking in legitimacy, to those who hold that it was done specifically to favour the interests of media conglomerate Grupo Clarín.
In a dialogue with state news agency Télam, Juan Carlos Dante Gullo of the Frente Para La Victoria party stated: “In principle the decree violates our federal spirit, articles of the constitution, and, unfortunately, forces us to engage in discussions about the privileges one business, and that business is called Clarín, instead of engaging with projects which benefit our citizens and those citizens who live in the capital.”
City legislator María América González went on to say “this decree a null bill. It attempts to supersede national legislation, something which is forbidden in the constitution.”
Despite its critics, the move has seen support in the province of Córdoba where governor Juan Manuel de la Sota enacted a similar bill last Friday. It seeks to circumvent any actions which “restrict, alter or censure” freedom of expression.
In a similar vein, Friday saw a group of journalists sign a document that rejected any intervention at all on the part of the State in its affairs. The Argentine Association of Journalistic Entities (ADEPA) meanwhile published a document that contained a robust support for the decree.







