The Kirchnerist governments have had their fair share of political scandals over the years, most of which have been played out very publicly for the world to see and cast judgement on. However, one of the government’s most sensational and drawn out political disputes is with media conglomerate Grupo Clarín, the largest in the country. The relationship between the two institutions has been extremely fraught since the 2008 ‘campo crisis‘ and the 2009 media law, which forces Clarín, as well as other media groups, to divest an important number of its assets.

Néstor Kirchner and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (photo: Wikimedia commons)
What started as a power struggle between the two sides has developed into a political war, and the latest report broadcast by one of Clarín’s TV channels implicating President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and her late husband Néstor Kirchner in a money laundering scheme, promises to antagonise the situation further.
The Allegations
In several instalments of the television show Periodismo Para Todos (PPT), which airs on Clarín-owned Channel 13 on Sunday nights, journalist Jorge Lanata has presented testimonies, including hidden-camera footage, that implicate the Kirchners in a multi-million dollar corruption scandal.
According to sources making the allegations, the Kirchners have played key roles in a money laundering network to execute millions of dollars worth of corrupt tenders for public development and infrastructure projects. The total amount that is suspected to have been laundered by the Kirchners and their network is unknown, although sources say up to US$500m of public funds have been embezzled.

Jorge Lanata on PPT (photo: Wikipedia)
One of the first witnesses to come forward in this case was Nestor Kirchner’s ex secretary Miriam Quiroga, who revealed on Lanata’s show that she saw bags – which she believed had money in them – being passed around the Casa Rosada while working for the former president. These bags, she says, were sent by private jet to the Kirchners’ mansion in Santa Cruz province, to then be deposited in a specially constructed vault. The money is believed to have then been flown to tax havens abroad, including Switzerland, Panama, and Belize.
The vault, supposedly fitted specially at the Kirchners’ home, has been a highlighted piece of information in this unfolding political scandal and the subject of great intrigue in Lanata’s show. The first source to speak up about the existence of the alleged safe was former deputy governor of Santa Cruz, Eduardo Arnold, who told Lanata that the vault was specifically fitted and used in the Kirchners’ home for money laundering purposes.
Unsurprisingly, next up in Lanata’s primetime drama was the Kirchners’ family architect Antonio Canas, who revealed the structural plans of the residence in El Calafate, and told viewers about a vault-like room “like that of a bank’s” that was especially built on the request of Néstor Kirchner “to keep documents safe”.
The Accused
Another key player in this alleged money laundering network is Argentine businessman Lázaro Baez, who has been pegged as the Kirchners’ main accomplice. One of the typical money funnelling transactions that is currently under investigation from Báez’s business empire, Austral Construcciones, is that of a fraudulent cover up investment. In 2011, Baez’s business recorded an income of more than $254.3m from ‘mysterious’ trust funds in Uruguay. However, the investment, due to come from a Dutch registered company, was never received, although a failure to record this kept the balance sheets firmly in order.
These new findings cast a darker shadow on the connection between Báez and Cristina Fernández and Néstor Kirchner, the latter of which is said to have awarded Báez some of the main public works contracts of Santa Cruz when he was the province’s governor. Public tenders have been left in the hands of Austral Construcciones for the last decade.

The Kirchner family mausoleum in Rio Gallegos (photo: Wikimedia commons)
Santa Cruz’s former prosecutor and lawyer Andres Vivanco spoke out on the weekend about the latest findings. Speaking to Radio Mitre, he said that Báez “was previously just a bank employee who has no legal way of justifying his increased equity”.
“All Lázaro Báez has is from Néstor Kirchner. He previously had nothing; he was not an entrepreneur because he never risked his capital, he would always just wait to submit a public ‘tender’ with the government.” Vivanco added that the former president had frequently told his inner circle that “no one could govern without using corrupted means”.
Another suspect in the case is businessman Leonardo Fariña, who in one of Lanata’s weekly instalments was secretly filmed telling the journalist about his involvement in the money laundering deals. Fariña is believed to have been managing the accounts for various businesses that Báez and the Kirchners were allegedly involved in. However, he later denied his involvement, saying that he was aware of the secret filming activity and was merely “playing along”. “Lanata wanted fiction, so I gave him fiction,” Fariña said.
The Drama
As the pieces of this disturbing puzzle come together, Lanata is continuing to keep viewers at the edge of their seats with a week-by-week telenovela-style drama; and the latest show which aired last Sunday night was no exception. The programme released footage of the former president Néstor Kichner joking about opening a safe, and Clarín, in a manner that reflects its political tone, described it as being similar to “a child running to open his Christmas presents”.
Additionally, Lanata also revealed details that implicate Néstor Kirchner and Báez in another alleged money laundering scam with a representative of the Buenos Aires Racing Club football team, Miguel Ángel Pires. According to Lanata, the trio worked together to funnel government funds for the purchase of football players, Roberto Ramírez, Pablo Luguercio, Cristian Pellerano, and Leandro González.

Periodismo Para Todos
“I saw him (Pires) at least twice, with the club’s former secretary Daniel Muñoz handing over bags of money to buy players,” journalist Nicolas Wiñazki told the audience on Sunday’s edition of PPT, where he also said that Pires knew Báez since his son, Martín Baez, lived with Pires’ mum when he was studying in Buenos Aires. Pires, however, has denied personally knowing the Báez family and, as with many other aspects of this case, it all comes down to conflicting testimonies rather than solid evidence.
With Sunday’s show packed with twist and turns, it is safe to say that, once again, Lanata reeled his audience in and gave them the controversy and drama that 22% of Argentina’s population tune in for every week. And with its rising popularity comes another twist, and this time from the government. The Argentine Football Association (AFA) announced last week that one of the popular national first division matches, involving either Boca Juniors or River Plate, will now begin at 9.30pm on Sunday evening; a move that is believed to have come from government orders to conflict with the TV schedule of PPT.
The Case
As speculation and evidence has mounted over the last month, the inquiry has been brought to the attention of the District Attorney of Investigations of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism who launched an official investigation in mid-April.
Deputy Elisa Carrió took the case before the court alongside opposition representatives Patricia Bullrich, Federico Pinedo, Laura Alonso, and Carlos Brown. Further, the prosecution judge Sebastian Cassanello has called for an investigation into all of the businesses that Baez and Leonardo Fariña are linked to.
Talking about the case, Carrió said: “The information [from the released footage] does not surprise me… It is clear that [Néstor] Kirchner was Lázaro Báez’s boss. I presented the lawsuit for illicit association of [Néstor] Kirchner and Lázaro Báez. There was a fraudulent manoeuvre of US$400m. In this moment, Cristina [Férnandez de] Kirchner and Lázaro Báez are accomplices.”
Quiroga was one of the first witnesses to stand before the court last week, where she spoke for more than four hours about her time as Kirchner’s secretary. Media reports based on ‘inside sources’ offer conflicting versions about her testimony in court, but generally coincide on highlighting that she ratified witnessing meetings between Kirchner and several businessmen, although she could not confirm that they were ‘business partners’. Quiroga did not give testimony regarding the alleged money bags, as that case is being handled by a different judge. She has since been placed under a witness protection programme.
Báez was charged for being a suspect in the case on 3rd May, and since then he has provided a written statement in rejection of the money-laundering suit filed against him. The businessman said that he would “clarify once and for all” the charges made against him. Báez claimed he would help judicial authorities with the investigation that also includes his son Martín Baez and three other businessmen, Federico Elaskar, Fabian Rossi, and Daniel Perez. “As an honest person that I am, I am rejecting these false accusations,” said Báez in a letter to the court.
Meanwhile, the government held its silence about the case until last Friday, when the presidency’s undersecretary Gustavo López accused Grupo Clarin of launching an anti-government campaign to coincide with October’s mid-term elections. “This criminal investigation is an invention and an attack on the government.” He added that the accusations are a sign of “disrespect against a person [Nestor Kirchner] who is now dead and cannot defend himself. ”
Senator Aníbal Fernández has also spoken up about the issue and called Lanata’s investigation into the money laundering “stupid”. “It is not the first time that Grupo Clarín has lied, but for me, it makes no sense. There are four reports that are not going to go anywhere, because they don’t have sufficient evidence.”
As fresh allegations and denials surface daily, time will only tell if Lanata’s investigations have any grounds to tarnish the Kirchner government, and its legacy. However, one thing is clear; as this political show continues to play out, luring in spectators with its twists and cliffhangers, Lanata and PPT, much to the government’s frustration, will not be going anywhere soon.
The Indy took to the streets to hear what people had to say about these allegations. Click here to find out.