The Supreme court yesterday has declared itself ready to intervene in the argument between Córdoba and the national government in a row over pension payments. The provincial government claims it is owed $1,040 million from ANSeS, the public body in charge of pensions and social security.
However Anses and the national government claim Córdoba province has not adjusted its pension calculations in line with the agreement, rendering it incomplete.
The Court yesterday promised a conciliatory hearing for the second half of September.
The argument between José De La Sota’s government and ANSeS began at the end of last year, when the Nation suspended pension funds to Córdoba. De La Sota claims a debt of more than $1bn was accumulated but ANSeS denies these payments should be made. The social security programme claims that the funds were a part of the Armonizacion y Finanancimiento Previsional agreement, which, according to them remains incomplete.
The Supreme Court has historically intervened in economic disputes such as this between the national and provincial government. However a few days ago, tribunal judge, Eugenio Zaffaroni publicly stated that Santa Fe and Cordoba judges should “meet around a negotiating table” and not leave the decision to the Supreme Court.
This statement was derided by Hermes Binner, ex presidential candidate for the Frente Amplio Progresista who said “where else are the provinces going to go? To the moon?”
The Court will decide on a date for the hearing in a few days, after which it will confirm whether to proceed with the injunction against the national state requested by Córdoba.
According the Court sources, a payment had been agreed by both parties. However the Nation argues that the province has not amended its pension legislation, rendering the agreement incomplete. Córdoba claim the legislation was completed.
Head of the Ombudsman’s office, Anselmo Sella added his voice to claims surrounding incomplete pension legislation yesterday, claiming the issue was not with ANSeS.
“In 2009 the province agreed to converge with all the points of the contract, including the determination of the pension system,” he said yesterday.
“The agreement requires that pensions be based on the last ten years of work, as with the national plan, not the four years as is currently the norm in the province.”
Amidst this conflict, the provincial government almost unanimously agreed on a law proposed by José Manuel De la Sota to nullify the 1992 Fiscal Pact which allows the nation to retain pension funds from the provinces.
The pact allowed the National government to keep 15% of Coparticipation funds from Córdoba and 11 other provinces to finance pensions. Pension legislation was re-organised in 2008 but this 15% was never returned to the provinces. Now Cordoba argues it should have been.
Last week De La Sota called for a rejection of this pact and called for a “recuperation of what is owed to the provinces.”
